Message100582
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | effbot, flox, pitrou, r.david.murray, scoder |
| Date | 2010-03-07.14:41:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.010640004 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1267972869.88.0.936112865053.issue8047@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
As Florent said, it is a rule of py3k to avoid implicit encoding/decoding. The fact that it could have made sense for 2.x as well is not relevant, since the change was only done in py3k (and for good reason: we normally try not to break compatibility without prior notice). In any case, I have trouble understanding your concern here. Do you think the change is bad? Is it really that difficult to support it in lxml? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-07 14:41:09 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, effbot, scoder, r.david.murray, flox |
| 2010-03-07 14:41:09 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1267972869.88.0.936112865053.issue8047@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-03-07 14:41:08 | pitrou | link | issue8047 messages |
| 2010-03-07 14:41:08 | pitrou | create | |