Message102750
| Author | fperez |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yaroslav.Halchenko, brian.curtin, exarkun, fperez, michael.foord, pitrou |
| Date | 2010-04-09.21:19:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.9703694e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1270847991.24.0.339680255809.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Yarick: Yes, I do actually see the value of the summary view. When I have a parametric test that fails, I tend to just run nose with -x so it stops at the first error and with the --pdb options to study it, so I simply ignore all the other failures. To me, test failures are quite often like compiler error messages: if there's a lot of them, it's best to look only at the first few, fix those and try again, because the rest could be coming from the same cause. I don't know if Michael has plans/bandwidth to add the summary support as well, but I agree it would be very nice to have, just not at the expense of individual reporting. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-04-09 21:19:51 | fperez | set | recipients: + fperez, exarkun, pitrou, michael.foord, brian.curtin, Yaroslav.Halchenko |
| 2010-04-09 21:19:51 | fperez | set | messageid: <1270847991.24.0.339680255809.issue7897@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-04-09 21:19:49 | fperez | link | issue7897 messages |
| 2010-04-09 21:19:49 | fperez | create | |