Message104271
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | LambertDW, akuchling, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, eric.araujo, flox, ggenellina, gregory.p.smith, hozn, marystern, pitrou, tormen, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-04-26.20:22:20 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.7349734e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1272313342.39.0.237096545424.issue5099@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm -1 on Brett's patch: keep a reference to the required functions in the function arguments is ugly to me. The process should be destroyed before unloading the modules. I don't know how (or even if it's possible or not :-)), but I think that Brett's patch is the wrong solution to the problem. Eg. Can't we use atexit.register() to destroy the processes at exit? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-04-26 20:22:22 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, akuchling, brett.cannon, gregory.p.smith, ggenellina, pitrou, LambertDW, eric.araujo, marystern, brian.curtin, hozn, flox, tormen |
| 2010-04-26 20:22:22 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1272313342.39.0.237096545424.issue5099@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-04-26 20:22:21 | vstinner | link | issue5099 messages |
| 2010-04-26 20:22:20 | vstinner | create | |