Message104738
| Author | dabrahams |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, dabrahams, docs@python, mark, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2010-05-01.19:04:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.05135501 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1272740661.27.0.887910976482.issue8557@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
@r.david.murray: did you try running my test? I think it shows that we are pretty darned close to fully portable. I believe we could fix Popen to make it fully portable pretty easily. In fact, there may be a pure-python fix. Documenting the differences would also not be hard. I would discourage you from relying *solely* on a description such as "uses execvpe on POSIX" to describe the semantics. Aside from being a nonportable description, it doesn't help anyone who isn't familiar with the POSIX system calls. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-05-01 19:04:21 | dabrahams | set | recipients: + dabrahams, mark, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, docs@python |
| 2010-05-01 19:04:21 | dabrahams | set | messageid: <1272740661.27.0.887910976482.issue8557@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-05-01 19:04:19 | dabrahams | link | issue8557 messages |
| 2010-05-01 19:04:19 | dabrahams | create | |