Message 104939 - Python tracker

Message104939

Author	pitrou
Recipients	akr, barry, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm, glyph, gregory.p.smith, iankko, loewis, pitrou, psss, thoger
Date	2010-05-04.14:09:48
SpamBayes Score	0.00021848881
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1272982331.3554.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to	<1272975478.47.0.550869653118.issue5753@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> Can anyone move this to Stage: patch review (for the fix approach > proposed in msg90336)? Or does anyone have better idea on how to move > this closer to final fix or wontfix / reject? Thank you! I stand by my opinion that adding another hack in the initialization path will not do us a lot of good, while a separate API would solve the problem neatly. Perhaps Dave Malcolm can chime in?

Content

> Can anyone move this to Stage: patch review (for the fix approach
> proposed in msg90336)?  Or does anyone have better idea on how to move
> this closer to final fix or wontfix / reject?  Thank you!

I stand by my opinion that adding another hack in the initialization
path will not do us a lot of good, while a separate API would solve the
problem neatly. Perhaps Dave Malcolm can chime in?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-05-04 14:09:49	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, loewis, barry, gregory.p.smith, benjamin.peterson, glyph, psss, iankko, akr, thoger, dmalcolm
2010-05-04 14:09:48	pitrou	link	issue5753 messages
2010-05-04 14:09:48	pitrou	create