Message105032
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Yaniv.Aknin, bethard, eric.araujo, eric.smith |
| Date | 2010-05-05.13:57:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0018751634 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1273067841.93.0.098240155004.issue8538@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Are we sure we want three or four ways to spell the same thing? --foo and --no-foo seem a useful couple to me, and --with-foo/--without-foo cater to different use cases. Perhaps it would be ok to have a SwitchAction (or FlagAction) for --thing/--no-hing and one ConfigureAction for the --with[out]-* style. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-05-05 13:57:22 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, bethard, eric.smith, Yaniv.Aknin |
| 2010-05-05 13:57:21 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1273067841.93.0.098240155004.issue8538@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-05-05 13:57:19 | eric.araujo | link | issue8538 messages |
| 2010-05-05 13:57:19 | eric.araujo | create | |