Message105464
| Author | loewis |
|---|---|
| Recipients | loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
| Date | 2010-05-10.20:23:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0017152183 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1273523010.72.0.521283637272.issue8677@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I personally don't think that a transition period would be a useful thing to have, in particular not if it goes like this: - in version A, require use of PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN - in version A+1, make use of PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN redundant So I'd rather drop PY_SSIZE_T clean altogether from 3.2, and risk any breakage that this may cause. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-05-10 20:23:30 | loewis | set | recipients: + loewis, mark.dickinson, pitrou |
| 2010-05-10 20:23:30 | loewis | set | messageid: <1273523010.72.0.521283637272.issue8677@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-05-10 20:23:29 | loewis | link | issue8677 messages |
| 2010-05-10 20:23:28 | loewis | create | |