Message105497
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | giampaolo.rodola, josiahcarlson, pitrou |
| Date | 2010-05-11.11:12:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00031324226 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1273576324.41.0.548705222794.issue8684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
This must be retargeted to 3.2. Also, the patch lacks some tests. It seems PEP 8 compliance could be better: function names shouldn't be CamelCased. Is LocalSynchronize() an implementation detail rather than a public API? If so, I think it would be better if it started with an underscore. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-05-11 11:12:04 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola |
| 2010-05-11 11:12:04 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1273576324.41.0.548705222794.issue8684@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-05-11 11:12:02 | pitrou | link | issue8684 messages |
| 2010-05-11 11:12:01 | pitrou | create | |