Message106608
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Trundle, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, tarek, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-05-27.12:11:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.041260146 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1274962281.31.0.664660375515.issue8828@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Would you prefer to not define the function instead of writing a pseudo- > atomic function? Your current implementation is useless, since it doesn't achieve anything new. Besides, if the function isn't atomic, don't name it atomic_XXX. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-05-27 12:11:21 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, tarek, Trundle |
| 2010-05-27 12:11:21 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1274962281.31.0.664660375515.issue8828@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-05-27 12:11:19 | pitrou | link | issue8828 messages |
| 2010-05-27 12:11:19 | pitrou | create | |