Message107097
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, mark.dickinson, mcherm, rhettinger, stutzbach, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-06-04.20:21:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.054434862 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1275682921.87.0.0486946944464.issue8860@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The timedelta(seconds=0.6112295) example is handled correctly No, it's not! It's being rounded *up* where it should be being rounded *down*. > because 0.6112295 sec is not half way between two nearest microseconds Exactly. The actual value stored by the C double is a little closer to 0.611229 than to 0.611230. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-06-04 20:22:02 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, mcherm, rhettinger, belopolsky, vstinner, stutzbach |
| 2010-06-04 20:22:01 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1275682921.87.0.0486946944464.issue8860@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-06-04 20:21:59 | mark.dickinson | link | issue8860 messages |
| 2010-06-04 20:21:59 | mark.dickinson | create | |