Message107987
| Author | rharris |
|---|---|
| Recipients | florianfesti, georg.brandl, karld, lucas_malor, pitrou, rharris |
| Date | 2010-06-17.02:24:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.10273749 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1276741452.08.0.381745015025.issue1675951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Are compatibility concerns the main reason this patch has yet to be applied? If so, could we allay those fears by keeping the default seek-y behavior and only introducing the new seek-less style when a 'noseek' flag is passed? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-06-17 02:24:12 | rharris | set | recipients: + rharris, georg.brandl, pitrou, lucas_malor, florianfesti, karld |
| 2010-06-17 02:24:12 | rharris | set | messageid: <1276741452.08.0.381745015025.issue1675951@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-06-17 02:24:10 | rharris | link | issue1675951 messages |
| 2010-06-17 02:24:10 | rharris | create | |