Message108035
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, pitrou, r.david.murray, techtonik, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-06-17.16:46:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00015709094 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1276793190.78.0.661578040039.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Porting PyPy implementation to 2.7 was fairly easy. I am posting the patch which makes PyPy datetime.py pass regression tests when dropped in the trunk. I expect 3.x port to be uneventful as well. Raising the priority because I would like to check this in before other datetime feature requests. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-06-17 16:46:30 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, brett.cannon, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-06-17 16:46:30 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1276793190.78.0.661578040039.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-06-17 16:46:29 | belopolsky | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-06-17 16:46:28 | belopolsky | create | |