Message108055
| Author | brett.cannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-06-17.19:47:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.010914804 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1276804040.74.0.703804496332.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I would simply email their developer mailing list (find it at http://pypy.org/contact.html) and say that you are willing to work on this. Maciej and I have discussed this before, so this won't be a total shock to them. As for Raymond's comment, I think he understood what I meant. What he is worried about is that datetime as PyPy has implemented it is done in RPython which is a custom subset of Python, and not a "normal" Python implementation. But if they have simply been maintaining the pure Python version that Tim wrote way back in the day then I suspect it's not in RPython. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-06-17 19:47:20 | brett.cannon | set | recipients: + brett.cannon, lemburg, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-06-17 19:47:20 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1276804040.74.0.703804496332.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-06-17 19:47:19 | brett.cannon | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-06-17 19:47:19 | brett.cannon | create | |