Message 108056 - Python tracker

Message108056

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, vstinner
Date	2010-06-17.20:14:03
SpamBayes Score	0.07557907
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1276805647.0.0.493291783319.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I am attaching datetime-sandbox-pypy.diff, a plain diff between six-year-old sandbox and pypy versions. (Plain diff is cleaner than unified diff.) You can see that the differences are trivial. I notice, however that original datetime implementation was returning subclass instances from operations on datetime subclass instances. Brett, this is off-topic hear, but I would appreciate your take on msg107410. BTW, in order to preserve history, it may be a good idea to develop this in a branch off datetime sandbox and merge it back when ready.

Content

I am attaching datetime-sandbox-pypy.diff, a plain diff between six-year-old sandbox and pypy versions.  (Plain diff is cleaner than unified diff.)

You can see that the differences are trivial.  I notice, however that original datetime implementation was returning subclass instances from operations on datetime subclass instances.  Brett, this is off-topic hear, but I would appreciate your take on msg107410.

BTW, in order to preserve history, it may be a good idea to develop this in a branch off datetime sandbox and merge it back when ready.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-06-17 20:14:07	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban
2010-06-17 20:14:06	belopolsky	set	messageid: <1276805647.0.0.493291783319.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-06-17 20:14:04	belopolsky	link	issue7989 messages
2010-06-17 20:14:04	belopolsky	create