Message108478
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, mark.dickinson, orsenthil, pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-06-23.19:26:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.005207281 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1277321179.3202.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1277316082.09.0.450786899993.issue9025@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Some considerations for the PRNG are: > * equidistribution (for quality) > * repeatability from the same seed (even in multithreaded environments) I believe a reasonable (com)promise would be to guarantee repeatability accross a given set of bugfix releases (for example, accross all 2.6.x releases). We shouldn't necessarily commit to repeatability accross feature releases, especially if it conflicts with desireable opportunities for improvement. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-06-23 19:26:22 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, orsenthil, vstinner |
| 2010-06-23 19:26:21 | pitrou | link | issue9025 messages |
| 2010-06-23 19:26:21 | pitrou | create | |