Message109136
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-07-02.21:28:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.018081099 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTimn7hOKVnAEnNQFMZ1fxFR6XacVfE7p0tB1woMW@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1278105799.03.0.334983474089.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > Even with 2.5 int(x) cannot overflow, and returns a long when needed! > This assert probably checks that the number has no fractional part. Yes I've realized that. I thought x was coming from integer arithmetics, but apparently datetime.py loves floats! |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-02 21:28:14 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-07-02 21:28:12 | belopolsky | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-07-02 21:28:12 | belopolsky | create | |