Message109152
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-07-02.23:38:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0006881007 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1278113911.75.0.670250034664.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I am attaching a patch from issue 5288 as an example of a change that I would favor more than issue7989-cmp.diff. This patch eliminates _utcoffset and _dst methods that duplicate utcoffset and dst, but return integer minutes rather than a timedelta. I am not checking these changes in sandbox because these are examples of how I plan to improve C implementation when datetime.py makes it into the main tree. I envision such changes to be discussed within context of datetime.py and if approved, implemented in C and committed simultaneously. Improving datetime.py implementation and making it diverge from C implementation defeats the purpose I see in having datetime.py in the first place. Antoine? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-02 23:38:32 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-07-02 23:38:31 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1278113911.75.0.670250034664.issue7989@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-02 23:38:30 | belopolsky | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-07-02 23:38:30 | belopolsky | create | |