Message109234
| Author | eric.araujo |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Christophe Simonis, ajaksu2, andybuckley, brian.curtin, christian.heimes, edemaine, eric.araujo, iki, meatballhat, tarek, tleeuwenburg@gmail.com |
| Date | 2010-07-04.16:37:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.050664198 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1278261479.2.0.262693709761.issue444582@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Is a “which” function that useful, since we have os.exec* functions that search the PATH for us? It seems to me that wanting to know the exact path of an executable is a specialized need, and that adding this function would make beginners use it instead of the os.exec* family. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-04 16:37:59 | eric.araujo | set | recipients: + eric.araujo, edemaine, christian.heimes, ajaksu2, tarek, Christophe Simonis, andybuckley, tleeuwenburg@gmail.com, brian.curtin, meatballhat, iki |
| 2010-07-04 16:37:59 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1278261479.2.0.262693709761.issue444582@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-04 16:37:57 | eric.araujo | link | issue444582 messages |
| 2010-07-04 16:37:56 | eric.araujo | create | |