Message109410
| Author | georg.brandl |
|---|---|
| Recipients | akitada, akuchling, amaury.forgeotdarc, brian.curtin, collinwinter, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jaylogan, jimjjewett, loewis, mark, moreati, mrabarnett, nneonneo, pitrou, r.david.murray, rsc, sjmachin, timehorse, vbr |
| Date | 2010-07-06.17:34:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0031555297 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1278437656.74.0.106037607937.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
FWIW, I'd love seeing the updated regex module in 3.2. Please do bring it up on python-dev. Looking at the latest module on PyPI, I noted that the regex.py file is very long (~3500 lines), even though it is quite compressed (e.g. no blank lines between methods). It would be good to split it up. This would also remove the need for underscore-prefixing most of the identifiers, since they would simply live in another (private) module. Things like the _create_header_file function should be put into utility scripts. The C file is also very long, but I think we all know why :) It would also be nice to see some performance comparisons -- where is the new engine faster, where does it return matches while re just loops forever, and where is the new engine slower? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-06 17:34:16 | georg.brandl | set | recipients: + georg.brandl, loewis, akuchling, collinwinter, gregory.p.smith, jimjjewett, sjmachin, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, nneonneo, rsc, timehorse, mark, vbr, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, jaylogan, akitada, moreati, r.david.murray, brian.curtin |
| 2010-07-06 17:34:16 | georg.brandl | set | messageid: <1278437656.74.0.106037607937.issue2636@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-06 17:34:15 | georg.brandl | link | issue2636 messages |
| 2010-07-06 17:34:14 | georg.brandl | create | |