Message109705
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | dalke, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, nnorwitz |
| Date | 2010-07-09.10:09:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.02667419 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTin4y1ya0yiRk1tlWdEwZkcqr1Pn9xpSeYGdF-MO@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1278667687.35.0.586829328207.issue2009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> BTW, I'm a bit surprised that the grammar doesn't allow for trailing commas after keyword-only arguments: that is, > > def f(a, b,): ... is fine, but > def f(*, a, b,): ... is a SyntaxError That seems more like an oversight than a deliberate restriction. Does your patch eliminate the discrepancy? (And agreed the moratorium doesn't apply). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-09 10:09:35 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, nnorwitz, dalke, mark.dickinson |
| 2010-07-09 10:09:34 | ncoghlan | link | issue2009 messages |
| 2010-07-09 10:09:34 | ncoghlan | create | |