Message109707
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | dalke, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, nnorwitz |
| Date | 2010-07-09.10:28:00 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.014712037 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTilYj3GCgPv5G1BnwBmpMRdU_rwXWX8kYfCrT7oY@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1278670818.77.0.295577182012.issue2009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> No, "def f(*, a,): ..." is still a SyntaxError with the patch. I'd think that allowing that extra comma *would* be a violation of the moratorium, though maybe it's debatable. Perhaps worth bringing up on python-dev? Good point - I just wouldn't worry about it in that case. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-09 10:28:02 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, nnorwitz, dalke, mark.dickinson |
| 2010-07-09 10:28:01 | ncoghlan | link | issue2009 messages |
| 2010-07-09 10:28:00 | ncoghlan | create | |