Message110156
| Author | rnk |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gregory.p.smith, hobb0001, jyasskin, pitrou, rnk |
| Date | 2010-07-13.04:12:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.12133205 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1278994330.64.0.704026802337.issue8844@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Alternatively, do you think it would be better to ignore interrupts when a timeout is passed? If a timeout is passed, the lock acquire will eventually fail in a deadlock situation, and the signal will be handled in the eval loop. However, if the timeout is sufficiently long, this is still a problem. I'd prefer to do that or use gettimeofday from _time than leave this as is. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-13 04:12:10 | rnk | set | recipients: + rnk, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, jyasskin, hobb0001 |
| 2010-07-13 04:12:10 | rnk | set | messageid: <1278994330.64.0.704026802337.issue8844@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-13 04:12:08 | rnk | link | issue8844 messages |
| 2010-07-13 04:12:08 | rnk | create | |