Message110244
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bethard, nvie, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2010-07-13.23:42:09 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.016683185 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1279064530.7.0.0736944312046.issue9253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've added Steven as nosy so he knows this was reposted here. I've also set the priority to low. Personally I'm at least -0 on this, since if I use a command that has subcommands I expect to get an error if I supply an invalid subcommand. As you say, however, the command designer *could* be supplied with the opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot :) The issue isn't going to go anywhere unless someone proposes a patch, though. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-13 23:42:10 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, bethard, nvie |
| 2010-07-13 23:42:10 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1279064530.7.0.0736944312046.issue9253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-13 23:42:09 | r.david.murray | link | issue9253 messages |
| 2010-07-13 23:42:09 | r.david.murray | create | |