Message111577
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, lukasz.langa, mark.dickinson, rhettinger |
| Date | 2010-07-25.23:41:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | 8.755544e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1280101283.9.0.980353583014.issue9379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm happy to improve the docs and docstring a bit to match the description for range(). I don't want to change any of the keyword arguments because it can break code that currently works and has been working for ages. It's a fact of life that the range() signature is complicated to express in pure Python. I don't feel any need to reformulate the existing code -- it has been working fine for people for a *very* long time. Conceptually, it's misleading but in practice people seem to just get it. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-25 23:41:23 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, mark.dickinson, BreamoreBoy, lukasz.langa |
| 2010-07-25 23:41:23 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1280101283.9.0.980353583014.issue9379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-25 23:41:22 | rhettinger | link | issue9379 messages |
| 2010-07-25 23:41:22 | rhettinger | create | |