Message111663
| Author | lvogt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, docs@python, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lvogt, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2010-07-26.19:48:49 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0041754274 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1280173731.9.0.726954469023.issue7447@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thank you. I think the specific list of list example is better for the sum documentation because lists support the + operator. I don't think that someone would consider using sum for chaining arbitrary iterables. What about a concise "To concatenate lists use itertools.chain.from_iterable." and letting the "apply list constructor" part as an exercise to the reader? I did the explicit reference to itertools.itertools.chain.from_iterable since the default or the explicit link to itertools.chain.from_iterable did not produce a correct link in the html docs. I applied patch3 and ran make html; there is no html link to from_iterable produced. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-26 19:48:52 | lvogt | set | recipients: + lvogt, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, docs@python |
| 2010-07-26 19:48:51 | lvogt | set | messageid: <1280173731.9.0.726954469023.issue7447@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-07-26 19:48:50 | lvogt | link | issue7447 messages |
| 2010-07-26 19:48:49 | lvogt | create | |