Message112546
| Author | jaraco |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, eric.smith, jaraco |
| Date | 2010-08-02.20:56:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.01797917 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1280782591.06.0.823234044426.issue9333@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I love it -- especially all of the '-' lines in the patch! Good work. Is it conceivable that a Windows XP user would have that privilege (and thus would have access to a non-functional os.symlink function)? One thing I particularly like is this provides an interface (os._symlink) that developers can use if they expect privileges to change at runtime, but for the majority of use cases, the os.symlink interface is otherwise largely consistent. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-08-02 20:56:31 | jaraco | set | recipients: + jaraco, eric.smith, brian.curtin |
| 2010-08-02 20:56:31 | jaraco | set | messageid: <1280782591.06.0.823234044426.issue9333@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-08-02 20:56:29 | jaraco | link | issue9333 messages |
| 2010-08-02 20:56:29 | jaraco | create | |