Message112617
| Author | lukasz.langa |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, ezio.melotti, fdrake, lukasz.langa |
| Date | 2010-08-03.14:47:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.3949976e-06 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1280846879.47.0.17748830308.issue9452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
FTR, some people questioned the purpose of read_dict(). Let me summarize this very briefly here: - the API is using dictionaries similar to those in defaults= but has one level of depth more (sections) - initializing a parser with a dictionary produces syntax that is more natural in code - having a single method implementing reading a dictionary with unit tests, support for proper duplicate handling, etc. frees users from writing their own - we need that anyway for upcoming mapping protocol access discussed in #5412 - more detailed use cases in msg112429 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-08-03 14:47:59 | lukasz.langa | set | recipients: + lukasz.langa, fdrake, ezio.melotti, brian.curtin |
| 2010-08-03 14:47:59 | lukasz.langa | set | messageid: <1280846879.47.0.17748830308.issue9452@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-08-03 14:47:57 | lukasz.langa | link | issue9452 messages |
| 2010-08-03 14:47:57 | lukasz.langa | create | |