Message113267
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bethard, nvie, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2010-08-08.14:30:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.4900746e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1281277813.61.0.832325714057.issue9253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
See also 9540, which has an alternate proposal (that I don't like as much) for how to handle parser arguments supplied after subparsers are declared. Reviewing this, I'm now +1 on fixing this *somehow*, since clearly there is an ambiguity here that needs to be resolved. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-08-08 14:30:13 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, bethard, nvie |
| 2010-08-08 14:30:13 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1281277813.61.0.832325714057.issue9253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-08-08 14:30:12 | r.david.murray | link | issue9253 messages |
| 2010-08-08 14:30:11 | r.david.murray | create | |