Message116288
| Author | kristjan.jonsson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, giampaolo.rodola, kristjan.jonsson, loewis, pitrou |
| Date | 2010-09-13.08:00:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | 7.7467256e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1284364831.25.0.191709368293.issue9786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I've changed the function as you suggest, although there are in fact no failure detection semantics defined for PyThread_create_key(). See e.g. thread.c:294 /* Return a new key. This must be called before any other functions in * this family, and callers must arrange to serialize calls to this * function. No violations are detected. */ int PyThread_create_key(void) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-09-13 08:00:31 | kristjan.jonsson | set | recipients: + kristjan.jonsson, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola |
| 2010-09-13 08:00:31 | kristjan.jonsson | set | messageid: <1284364831.25.0.191709368293.issue9786@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-09-13 08:00:29 | kristjan.jonsson | link | issue9786 messages |
| 2010-09-13 08:00:28 | kristjan.jonsson | create | |