Message117366
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BreamoreBoy, daniel.urban, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2010-09-25.13:32:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00011835589 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1285421572.87.0.793192705103.issue9896@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> One other thought. If there is a perceived need, I would rather an > alternate approach that unifies a language a bit by letting range() > expose its arguments as a slice and modify its input to accept a slice. This sounds like an obscure complication to me. A range is not a slice and I don't see the point of trying to bridge both concepts. It is even more YAGNI than the original request. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-09-25 13:32:53 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, daniel.urban, BreamoreBoy |
| 2010-09-25 13:32:52 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1285421572.87.0.793192705103.issue9896@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-09-25 13:32:50 | pitrou | link | issue9896 messages |
| 2010-09-25 13:32:50 | pitrou | create | |