Message120674
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brian.curtin, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah |
| Date | 2010-11-07.12:30:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00026087445 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTinwzzie6-4Fxd2tjV-3oPJCmK_fLv8aN-mxF2Az@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1288754888.21.0.493810987272.issue7652@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Case Van Horsen <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Has the cdecimal branch kept up with the hash value changes in 3.2? Not sure; that's a question for Stefan. > Is there a still a chance that cdecimal could be merged into 3.2? A chance, yes; the major need is for someone with time to do a full review. (I'm afraid that's not me, right now.) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-07 12:30:59 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, casevh, eric.smith, jjconti, brian.curtin, skrah |
| 2010-11-07 12:30:58 | mark.dickinson | link | issue7652 messages |
| 2010-11-07 12:30:58 | mark.dickinson | create | |