Message120866
| Author | hfuru |
|---|---|
| Recipients | hfuru |
| Date | 2010-11-09.14:12:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.2896622e-05 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1289311942.35.0.609245522343.issue10375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Could 2to3 without -p notice more cases of print(single argument),
to avoid slapping another () around them? For example:
print(2*3)
print(", ".join(dir))
print(very + long
+ single + argument)
My internal bug detector zooms in on ((foo)) when I read Python code -
I'm seeing code where something was apparently left out, maybe an inner
comma to make it a tuple.
[Copied from Issue10070.] |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-09 14:12:22 | hfuru | set | recipients: + hfuru |
| 2010-11-09 14:12:22 | hfuru | set | messageid: <1289311942.35.0.609245522343.issue10375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-11-09 14:12:20 | hfuru | link | issue10375 messages |
| 2010-11-09 14:12:20 | hfuru | create | |