Message120886
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, brett.cannon, eli.bendersky, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2010-11-09.18:17:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0002641495 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Looks good in a cursory reading. I presume trace test still passes. If you change the signature of the renamed functions, that would break the current wrappings. Would you use new private functions with different names, or change the wrappings where possible? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-09 18:17:49 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, brett.cannon, belopolsky, eli.bendersky |
| 2010-11-09 18:17:49 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1289326669.46.0.316850126015.issue10371@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-11-09 18:17:48 | terry.reedy | link | issue10371 messages |
| 2010-11-09 18:17:48 | terry.reedy | create | |