Message121054
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, terry.reedy, william.barr |
| Date | 2010-11-12.18:50:13 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.022516293 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1289587829.09.0.429597016654.issue10365@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
That suggests that the last statement needs to be guarded somehow. I re-versioned to 3.2 because 3.1.final will be out very soon. I expect 3.2 and 2.7 should have same problem. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-12 18:50:29 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, william.barr |
| 2010-11-12 18:50:29 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1289587829.09.0.429597016654.issue10365@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-11-12 18:50:13 | terry.reedy | link | issue10365 messages |
| 2010-11-12 18:50:13 | terry.reedy | create | |