Message122198
| Author | jonny |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, jonny, loewis, rpetrov |
| Date | 2010-11-23.07:23:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | 2.0498963e-08 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1290497011.78.0.698724178551.issue10504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Why exactly are you skeptical? Because it doesn't fix everything in one go? The other changes are also minimal (I'm not even sure if it requires more source changes, maybe I have just to get my #defines right). If you prefer to see a single patch which you can reproduce to fix MinGW compilation completely, I'm willing to do that. Given that 2.7 is supposed to be a long time support version, I really think people should have a chance to use MinGW. The patch is trivial, but figuring out everything from the compiler error messages can be brain bending. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-23 07:23:31 | jonny | set | recipients: + jonny, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, rpetrov |
| 2010-11-23 07:23:31 | jonny | set | messageid: <1290497011.78.0.698724178551.issue10504@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-11-23 07:23:26 | jonny | link | issue10504 messages |
| 2010-11-23 07:23:26 | jonny | create | |