Message122251
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | terry.reedy |
| Date | 2010-11-23.23:37:44 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00026732197 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1290555468.47.0.0329661397161.issue10516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Add list.clear() method with obvious semantics. Pro: 1. parallel to set/dict/defaultdict/deque.clear(), usable in generic mutable collection function; 2. makes it easier to switch between list and other collection class; 3. current alternatives are not as obvious; 4. some people seem to expect it. Anti: 1. unneeded; del l[:] or l[:]=[] do same already. Guido: (python-ideas list, 'Set Syntax' thread, today) "FWIW I'm fine with adding list.clear() to 3.3." |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-23 23:37:48 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy |
| 2010-11-23 23:37:48 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1290555468.47.0.0329661397161.issue10516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-11-23 23:37:44 | terry.reedy | link | issue10516 messages |
| 2010-11-23 23:37:44 | terry.reedy | create | |