Message122516
| Author | eli.bendersky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, rhettinger, terry.reedy, xuanji |
| Date | 2010-11-27.10:37:43 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.065647e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTimiD08yP4iN-GAsoJ8k6H1t6=UM6RHHnkHHO0e6@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1290853226.41.0.136666577598.issue10516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> > Hi, I'm also looking at listobject.c also... if we want list.clear() to > behave exactly like del list[], we may be able to just call list_ass_slice > on the list. Similarly for list.copy which should behave like a=l[:] > Note that when executed to do 'del lst[:]' (i.e. with argument v set to 0 and ilow/ihigh to the maximal range of the list), list_ass_slice will just call list_clear anyway, which is a cue that this indeed is the right way to do it, despite the strange comment I mentioned in my message above. |
|
| Files | |
|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded |
| unnamed | eli.bendersky, 2010-11-27.10:37:42 |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-11-27 10:37:45 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients: + eli.bendersky, rhettinger, terry.reedy, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, xuanji |
| 2010-11-27 10:37:43 | eli.bendersky | link | issue10516 messages |
| 2010-11-27 10:37:43 | eli.bendersky | create | |