Message 123259 - Python tracker

Message123259

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	BreamoreBoy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, facundobatista, georg.brandl, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger, stutzbach
Date	2010-12-03.16:35:38
SpamBayes Score	6.814207e-06
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<AANLkTinHHy+-93Yxq9EMhAwhPwQppvS6SK=Ep11eDwZS@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1291393580.74.0.0735339460262.issue2690@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Daniel Stutzbach <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Daniel Stutzbach <stutzbach@google.com> added the comment: > >> (I also noticed that the new methods from issue #9213 are not mentioned >> in the range() docs > > Wasn't that fixed in Issue9746? Ah, I see what you mean. I was more referring to the lack of a versionchanged note on the range() documentation itself, rather than the mentioning of range() under the sequence types documentation. Some of my new additions to the range documentation could probably be deleted and replaced with a reference to that part of the docs. Cheers, Nick.

Content

On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Daniel Stutzbach <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Daniel Stutzbach <stutzbach@google.com> added the comment:
>
>> (I also noticed that the new methods from issue #9213 are not mentioned
>> in the range() docs
>
> Wasn't that fixed in Issue9746?

Ah, I see what you mean. I was more referring to the lack of a
versionchanged note on the range() documentation itself, rather than
the mentioning of range() under the sequence types documentation.

Some of my new additions to the range documentation could probably be
deleted and replaced with a reference to that part of the docs.

Cheers,
Nick.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-12-03 16:35:41	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, georg.brandl, rhettinger, facundobatista, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, stutzbach, BreamoreBoy
2010-12-03 16:35:38	ncoghlan	link	issue2690 messages
2010-12-03 16:35:38	ncoghlan	create