Message123485
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | hpk, michael.foord, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2010-12-06.18:29:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.3047071e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1291660173.8.0.0944719813721.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I would expect this code to report an error of some sort, not pass as an expected failure. The expected failure should be in the test case *only*, not in the setup or teardown methods. That is, I don't think this is a bug, I think it is a feature that allows one to debug one's test infrastructure. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-12-06 18:29:33 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, michael.foord, hpk |
| 2010-12-06 18:29:33 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1291660173.8.0.0944719813721.issue10548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-12-06 18:29:27 | r.david.murray | link | issue10548 messages |
| 2010-12-06 18:29:27 | r.david.murray | create | |