Message124078
| Author | r.david.murray |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.araujo, r.david.murray |
| Date | 2010-12-15.22:24:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00054389273 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1292451875.5.0.156276401735.issue9286@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I don't see any reason to use example.com in tests that are not talking to the network and aren't documentation. The interesting question about the other mailers is, if you *receive* an email with such an address (1) what does it show you and (2) what does it put into the To: field when you do a 'reply'? How you arrange to receive such a broken email, I'm not sure :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-12-15 22:24:35 | r.david.murray | set | recipients: + r.david.murray, eric.araujo |
| 2010-12-15 22:24:35 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1292451875.5.0.156276401735.issue9286@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-12-15 22:24:34 | r.david.murray | link | issue9286 messages |
| 2010-12-15 22:24:34 | r.david.murray | create | |