Message124609
| Author | scummos |
|---|---|
| Recipients | benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, rhettinger, scummos |
| Date | 2010-12-24.20:59:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | 9.177104e-13 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1293224356.5.0.372026911653.issue10769@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi, well, but you have to agree that there is no point in setting a correct column offset for bar in foo[bar] (it's correctly set to 4 here!) and foo(bar) but not for foo.bar (there's no information provided here) For me, this looks like it was just done the easiest way -- which is okay, of course, but is not a valid reason not to change it now. It's also not that there's fifty things missing to make it fully functional for the purpose of highlighting / analyzing the code, this is about the only one. :) Best regards, Sven |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-12-24 20:59:16 | scummos | set | recipients: + scummos, georg.brandl, rhettinger, benjamin.peterson |
| 2010-12-24 20:59:16 | scummos | set | messageid: <1293224356.5.0.372026911653.issue10769@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2010-12-24 20:59:14 | scummos | link | issue10769 messages |
| 2010-12-24 20:59:14 | scummos | create | |