Message125018
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, eric.araujo, eric.smith, georg.brandl, l0nwlf, loewis, lukasz.langa, pitrou, schof, twhitema |
| Date | 2011-01-02.00:01:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00024341073 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1293926467.3701.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1293926385.15.0.881737245563.issue8350@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Hmm, it may indeed be the best option to add a new directive option to > say "this function does not take keyword args". It would result in > some form of unobtrusive but noticeable output in HTML. Isn't it kind of a CPython-specific detail, though? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-02 00:01:13 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, georg.brandl, eric.smith, eric.araujo, twhitema, schof, l0nwlf, docs@python, lukasz.langa |
| 2011-01-02 00:01:10 | pitrou | link | issue8350 messages |
| 2011-01-02 00:01:10 | pitrou | create | |