Message125023
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, eric.araujo, georg.brandl, nailor, rhettinger, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2011-01-02.01:16:47 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0006151081 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1293931009.13.0.0888653862015.issue10789@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I concur that the one warning is enough. Implementations have been given wide latitude in this regard. Even within CPython there is not much uniformity -- some funcs/methods don't accept keywords, some will disregard keywords, and others may have keywords that are different from the name in the docs. I believe it would be a mistake to make to lock in the present state of accidental implementation details by documenting them in the main docs. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-02 01:16:49 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, eric.araujo, docs@python, nailor |
| 2011-01-02 01:16:49 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1293931009.13.0.0888653862015.issue10789@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-01-02 01:16:47 | rhettinger | link | issue10789 messages |
| 2011-01-02 01:16:47 | rhettinger | create | |