Message125124
| Author | Alexander.Belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Alexander.Belopolsky, SilentGhost, Trundle, belopolsky, georg.brandl, l0nwlf, ned.deily, sandro.tosi, vstinner, wsanchez |
| Date | 2011-01-02.23:17:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | 1.0164275e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTikarB1MtTY-Sz_ScgjJOvo-m3hc+FTov6Y89kDV@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1294009832.71.0.404652544037.issue8013@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Georg Brandl <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > All right, then I wonder why your checktm() doesn't check the tm_year? It is not mine. I thought it did. I might have missed that when I reviewed the patch or there was a reason for that at the time. Note that there is a comment that says: """ tm_year: [0, max(int)] (1) .. (1) gettmarg() handles bounds-checking. """ If you are ok with introducing stricter bounds checking in beta, I'll try to get to the bottom of it shortly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-02 23:18:50 | Alexander.Belopolsky | set | recipients: + Alexander.Belopolsky, georg.brandl, belopolsky, wsanchez, vstinner, ned.deily, Trundle, SilentGhost, sandro.tosi, l0nwlf |
| 2011-01-02 23:17:59 | Alexander.Belopolsky | link | issue8013 messages |
| 2011-01-02 23:17:59 | Alexander.Belopolsky | create | |