Message125483
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, eric.araujo, erob, flox, ggenellina, gvanrossum, oopos, pebbe, pitrou, quentel, r.david.murray, tcourbon, tercero12, tobias, v+python |
| Date | 2011-01-05.23:52:56 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.00010249748 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1294271574.3701.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1294270889.3.0.958185591738.issue4953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Antoine said: > (this is all funny in the light of the web-sig discussion where people > explain that CGI is such a natural model) > > Thanks for clarifying the stdin buffering vs. binary issue... it is as > I suspected. Maybe you can also explain the circumstances in which > "my" Windows code is needed, and whether Python's "-u" does it > automatically, but I still believe that "-u" shouldn't be necessary > for a properly functioning program, not even a CGI program... Could you open a separate bug with a simple piece of code to reproduce the issue (preferably without launching an HTTP server :))? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-05 23:53:02 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, barry, amaury.forgeotdarc, ggenellina, eric.araujo, v+python, r.david.murray, oopos, tercero12, tcourbon, tobias, flox, pebbe, quentel, erob |
| 2011-01-05 23:52:56 | pitrou | link | issue4953 messages |
| 2011-01-05 23:52:56 | pitrou | create | |