Message125629
| Author | quentel |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, eric.araujo, erob, flox, ggenellina, gvanrossum, oopos, pebbe, pitrou, quentel, r.david.murray, tcourbon, tercero12, tobias, v+python, vstinner |
| Date | 2011-01-07.08:14:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | 3.8605745e-09 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1294388067.8.0.33737975649.issue4953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Option 1 is impossible, because the CGI script sometimes has no control on the stream : for instance on a shared web host, it will receive sys.stdin as a text stream I also vote for option 3 ; explaining that if no argument is passed, the program will use sys.stdin.buffer (or the result of sys.stdin.detach() : I guess it's the same ?), and that if an argument is passed, it must provide an attribute "buffer" (or a method detach() ?) as the binary layer of the stream BTW, I didn't have time to finish the versions of cgi.py and tests, my next slot is this week-end |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-07 08:14:27 | quentel | set | recipients: + quentel, gvanrossum, barry, amaury.forgeotdarc, ggenellina, pitrou, vstinner, eric.araujo, v+python, r.david.murray, oopos, tercero12, tcourbon, tobias, flox, pebbe, erob |
| 2011-01-07 08:14:27 | quentel | set | messageid: <1294388067.8.0.33737975649.issue4953@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-01-07 08:14:25 | quentel | link | issue4953 messages |
| 2011-01-07 08:14:24 | quentel | create | |