Message126402
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, grahamd, loewis, mhammond, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date | 2011-01-17.15:06:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0025236793 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1295276794.3722.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1295276226.15.0.311350204913.issue10915@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Graham - the cases you describe are the things I was saying don't > currently work in my post and wouldn't be helped by Antoine's patch. > Your thoughts on how we could possibly make it work actually parallel > mine (although there may be fun and games with making sure the > respective GILs are acquired and released in an appropriate order when > switching interpreters). There is only a single GIL, not one per interpreter. And this mustn't change since some objects are shared and their reference counts shouldn't be touched concurrently. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-01-17 15:06:39 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, mhammond, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, grahamd |
| 2011-01-17 15:06:37 | pitrou | link | issue10915 messages |
| 2011-01-17 15:06:37 | pitrou | create | |