Message127792
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | kristjan.jonsson, mark.dickinson, pitrou, scoder |
| Date | 2011-02-03.13:32:50 |
| SpamBayes Score | 4.2830163e-07 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1296739968.3705.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| In-reply-to | <1296736446.82.0.125917468057.issue10227@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I find it interesting that the base line is way below the other > timings. That makes me think it's actually worth caching constant > slice instances, as CPython already does for tuples. Indeed. I have never touched it, but I suppose it needs an upgrade of the marshal format to support slices. (of course, this will not help for other common cases such as l[x:x+2]). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-02-03 13:32:51 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, mark.dickinson, scoder, kristjan.jonsson |
| 2011-02-03 13:32:50 | pitrou | link | issue10227 messages |
| 2011-02-03 13:32:50 | pitrou | create | |