Message128311
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | bobbyi, gregory.p.smith, neologix, pitrou |
| Date | 2011-02-10.17:02:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | 6.685939e-10 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1297357373.87.0.75525961369.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Are you suggesting to use pthread_atfork to call pthread_mutex_init on > all mutexes created by Python in the child after a fork? I'll have to > ponder that some more. Given the mutexes are all useless post fork it > does not strike me as a bad idea. I don't really understand. It's quite similar to the idea you shot down in msg94135. Or am I missing something? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-02-10 17:02:53 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, gregory.p.smith, bobbyi, neologix |
| 2011-02-10 17:02:53 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1297357373.87.0.75525961369.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-02-10 17:02:53 | pitrou | link | issue6721 messages |
| 2011-02-10 17:02:53 | pitrou | create | |