Message128841
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jdharper, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger |
| Date | 2011-02-19.10:45:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.044614878 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1298112337.11.0.0847516563791.issue11244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Unassigning. I don't think that r82043 is the *real* culprit here; that bugfix just happened to expose a deficiency in the peepholer; one that's already present in other situations: >>> dis.dis(lambda: 2*(3*4)) 1 0 LOAD_CONST 1 (2) 3 LOAD_CONST 4 (12) 6 BINARY_MULTIPLY 7 RETURN_VALUE >>> dis.dis(lambda: (2*3)*4) 1 0 LOAD_CONST 5 (24) 3 RETURN_VALUE Antoine, does your patch take care of this case too? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2011-02-19 10:45:37 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, rhettinger, pitrou, r.david.murray, jdharper |
| 2011-02-19 10:45:37 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1298112337.11.0.0847516563791.issue11244@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2011-02-19 10:45:36 | mark.dickinson | link | issue11244 messages |
| 2011-02-19 10:45:36 | mark.dickinson | create | |